This is something that most people do not understand. But the reason for this is that not-for-profit and for-profit companies operate in mostly the same way. As a consequence of this, it would be fiscally impossible for them provide the same sort of compensation. If this were the case, not-for-profit business would invariably end up with substantially less funding than comparable for-profit businesses. The not-for-profit company is supposed to sidestep opportunities that do not necessarily align with their mission, resulting in less profit but greater integrity, as maintaining their mission is supposed to be their goal. The for-profit company is supposed to be willing to utilize any sort of money-making opportunity to improve their bottom line which is supposed to be their goal. Take the ideological (and incorrect) definition of not-for-profit vs for-profit companies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |